Skip to main content

Table 1 Participant characteristics among those who identify as PWUS compared with those who do not identify as part of an equity-deserving group.

From: Emergency department care experiences among people who use substances: a qualitative study

Variable

Identifies as a Person Who Uses Substances (PWUS)

(% of N = 246)

Does Not Identify as Equity-Deserving

(% of N = 949)

Total Participants

(% of N = 1195)

P-value*

Gender Identity

   

0.0141

 Female

108 (44%)

517 (54%)

625 (52%)

 

 Male

131 (53%)

411 (43%)

542 (45%)

 

 Non-binary

1 (0%)

5 (1%)

6 (1%)

 

 Missing data

6 (2%)

16 (2%)

22 (2%)

 

Age

   

<0.0001

 < 18

6 (2%)

93 (10%)

99 (8%)

 

 18–25

31 (13%)

93 (10%)

124 (10%)

 

 26–45

92 (37%)

167 (18%)

259 (22%)

 

 46–65

49 (20%)

166 (17%)

215 (18%)

 

 > 65

8 (3%)

153 (16%)

161 (13%)

 

 Missing data

60 (24%)

277 (29%)

337 (28%)

 

If the patient is a person with a disability, which relates most to the story (type of disability)?

   

<0.0001

 Hearing loss/deafness

2 (1%)

11 (1%)

13 (1%)

 

 Low vision/blindness

0 (0%)

1 (0%)

1 (0%)

 

 Intellectual Disability

7 (3%)

3 (0%)

10 (1%)

 

 Physical Disability

24 (10%)

16 (2%)

40 (3%)

 

 Mental Health Disability

67 (27%)

14 (1%)

81 (7%)

 

 Other

10 (4%)

10 (1%)

20 (2%)

 

 Patient is not a person with a disability

63 (26%)

571 (60%)

634 (53%)

 

 Missing data

73 (30%)

323 (34%)

396 (33%)

 

What is patient’s sexual orientation?

   

<0.0001

 Asexual

0 (0%)

3 (0%)

3 (0%)

 

 Bisexual

36 (15%)

27 (3%)

63 (5%)

 

 Gay/Lesbian

4 (2%)

11 (1%)

15 (1%)

 

 Pansexual

8 (3%)

9 (1%)

17 (1%)

 

 Straight

184 (75%)

830 (87%)

1014 (85%)

 

 Questioning/unsure

1 (0%)

2 (0%)

3 (0%)

 

 Sexual orientation not on this list

0 (0%)

2 (0%)

2 (0%)

 

 Missing data

13 (5%)

65 (7%)

78 (7%)

 

Gender diverse

   

<0.0001

 Yes

11 (4%)

4 (0%)

15 (1%)

 

 No

223 (91%)

892 (94%)

1115 (93%)

 

 Missing data

12 (5%)

53 (6%)

65 (5%)

 

Frequency With Which Patient Struggles to Make Ends Meet

   

<0.0001

 Never

40 (16%)

524 (55%)

564 (47%)

 

 Rarely

24 (10%)

155 (16%)

179 (15%)

 

 Sometimes

48 (20%)

131 (14%)

179 (15%)

 

 Often

32 (13%)

34 (4%)

66 (6%)

 

 All the time

95 (39%)

32 (3%)

127 (11%)

 

 Missing data

7 (3%)

73 (8%)

80 (7%)

 

Where did the shared story take place?

   

< 0.0001

 Emergency Department

186 (76%)

545 (57%)

731 (61%)

 

 Urgent Care Centre

60 (24%)

404 (43%)

464 (39%)

 

Was the story a first-hand or second-hand experience?

   

< 0.0001

 First-hand personal experience

222 (90%)

771 (81%)

993 (83%)

 

 Second-hand experience

20 (8%)

171 (18%)

191 (16%)

 

 Other/Missing data

4 (2%)

7 (1%)

11 (1%)

 

How long ago was the shared ED visit?

   

0.8845

 0–6 months

94 (38%)

316 (33%)

410 (34%)

 

 7–12 months

28 (11%)

104 (11%)

132 (11%)

 

 13–18 months

17 (7%)

77 (8%)

94 (8%)

 

 19–24 months

33 (13%)

123 (13%)

156 (13%)

 

 More than 24 months

11 (4%)

42 (4%)

53 (4%)

 

 Not sure/Missing data

63 (26%)

287 (30%)

350 (29%)

 

How often do you think this situation occurs?

   

0.0006

 It happens all the time

100 (41%)

236 (25%)

336 (28%)

 

 It is somewhat typical

63 (26%)

267 (28%)

330 (28%)

 

 It happens from time to time

35 (14%)

159 (17%)

194 (16%)

 

 It is very rare

17 (7%)

91 (10%)

108 (9%)

 

 Missing Data

31 (13%)

196 (21%)

227 (19%)

 

How did your personal situation, identity, and culture impact the care experience?

   

<0.0001

 In a very bad way

56 (23%)

4 (0%)

60 (5%)

 

 In a bad way

41 (17%)

18 (2%)

59 (5%)

 

 It did not impact care

108 (44%)

715 (75%)

823 (69%)

 

 In a good way

14 (6%)

50 (5%)

64 (5%)

 

 In a very good way

7 (3%)

29 (3%)

36 (3%)

 

 Missing data

20 (8%)

133 (14%)

153 (13%)

 

Feelings About the ED Experience

   

<0.0001

 Positive

75 (30%)

550 (58%)

625 (52%)

 

 Negative

126 (51%)

242 (26%)

368 (31%)

 

 Mixed positive / negative

32 (13%)

79 (8%)

111 (9%)

 

 Missing data

13 (5%)

78 (8%)

91 (8%)

 

Shared Experience About Lack of Respect and/or Judgement

   

<0.0001

 No

123 (50%)

787 (83%)

910 (76%)

 

 Yes

98 (40%)

85(9%)

183 (15%)

 

 Missing data

25 (10%)

77 (8%)

102 (9%)

 

Number of EDG groups indicated

**Substance use, vulnerably housed, Indigenous, 2SLGBTQ+, ethnic minority, experiencing sexual assault/violence, mental health, disabilities

   

<0.0001

0

0 (0%)

949 (100%)

949 (49%)

 

1

38 (15%)

0 (0%)

503 (26%)

 

2

58 (24%)

0 (0%)

223 (11%)

 

3

150 (61%)

0 (0%)

268 (14%)

 
  1. *Chi-squared tests were used and did not include missing data / “not sure/prefer not to say”