Table 3 NCMS impact on intensity of catastrophic expenditure for TB care, China, 2012
Indicators | Study locations | All | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hanzhong | Yichang | Zhenjiang | ||
Mean Catastrophic Payment Gap (%) | ||||
Before reimbursement (MG B ) | 155.2 | 51.7 | 85.4 | 97.4 |
After reimbursement (MG A ) | 68.6 | 35.5 | 43.0 | 52.9 |
After reimbursement and subsidies (MG S ) | 65.6 | 31.3 | 42.7 | 49.8 |
Mean positive gap (%) | ||||
Before reimbursement (MPG B ) | 237.7 | 115.4 | 153.7 | 186.8 |
After reimbursement (MPG A ) | 161.8 | 105.6 | 91.0 | 135.8 |
After reimbursement and subsidies (MPG S ) | 157.3 | 98.2 | 90.5 | 130.0 |
Difference (%) | ||||
MG B -MG A | 86.6 | 16.2 | 42.4 | 44.5 |
MG A -MG S | 3.0 | 4.2 | 0.3 | 3.1 |
MPG B -MPG A | 75.9 | 9.8 | 62.7 | 51.0 |
MPG A -MPG S | 4.5 | 7.4 | 0.5 | 5.8 |