Skip to main content

Table 7 Univariate analysis (unadjusted results) of Resource Utilisation Bands at age 15 by socio-economic position variables

From: Socio-economic position and childhood multimorbidity: a study using linkage between the Avon Longitudinal study of parents and children and the general practice research database

Socio-economic marker

Resource Utilisation Band at age 15 (% within SEP category)

 

Non-user

Healthy user

Low or moderate morbidity

χ2; p-value

Mother’s education

O level or lower

28 (20.3%)

56 (40.6%)

54 (39.1%)

χ22 = 5.4; p = 0.07

A level or degree

7 (9.3%)

29 (38.7%)

39 (52.0%)

Father’s education

O level or lower

17 (15.6%)

47 (43.1%)

45 (41.3%)

χ22 = 1.0; p = 0.6

A level or degree

18 (17.3%)

38 (36.5%)

48 (46.2%)

Family social class

I, II, III non-manual

16 (13.6%)

46 (39.0%)

56 (47.5%)

χ22 = 2.3; p = 0.3

III manual, IV V

19 (20.0%)

39 (41.1%)

37 (39.0%)

Housing tenure (in pregnancy)

Owned/mortgaged

27 (16.5%)

67 (40.9%)

70 (42.7%)

χ22 = 0.3; p = 0.9

Other

8 (16.3%)

18 (36.7%)

23 (46.9%)

Family adversity index

0

16 (18.8%)

32 (37.7%)

37 (43.5%)

χ62 = 3.2; p = 0.8

1

10 (14.9%)

27 (40.3%)

30 (44.8%)

2

7 (18.9%)

17 (46.0%)

13 (35.1%)

 

≥3

2 (8.3%)

9 (37.5%)

13 (54.2%)

 

Townsend score (quintile)

1st (least deprived)

10 (15.4%)

26 (40.0%)

29 (44.6%)

χ62 = 2.8; p = 0.8

2

9 (21.4%)

19 (45.2%)

14 (33.3%)

3

8 (16.7%)

17 (35.4%)

23 (47.9%)

4th and 5th (most deprived)1

8 (13.8%)

23 (39.7%)

27 (46.6%)

  1. Groups combined as numbers small.