Table 4 Mixed logit models of transport mode choice
| Â | Commuting (1,788 trips) | Non-commuting (3,148 trips) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | 95% confidence interval | t-statistic | β | 95% confidence interval | t-statistic | |
Alternative-specific constants | ||||||
 Bicycle | -4.92 | -5.62 to -4.21 | -13.66 | -2.77 | -2.99 to -2.55 | -24.86 |
 Public transport | -4.70 | -5.55 to -3.85 | -10.83 | -5.59 | -6.02 to -5.16 | -25.25 |
 Car | -2.79 | -3.41 to -2.16 | -8.76 | -2.61 | -2.81 to -2.41 | -25.96 |
Random parameters (specific alternative)a | ||||||
 Cycleway distance (Bicycle) | -1.89 | -2.16 to -1.6 | -13.15 | -2.07 | -2.35 to -1.78 | -14.24 |
 Non-cycleway distance (Bicycle) | -2.65 | -3 to -2.3 | -15.05 | -3.35 | -3.84 to -2.86 | -13.37 |
 CBD (Bicycle) | -1.52 | -2.06 to -0.98 | -5.52 | -2.31 | -3.18 to -1.44 | -5.19 |
 Time (Walk) | -0.41 | -0.45 to -0.37 | -22.88 | -0.37 | -0.39 to -0.36 | -49.39 |
 Time (Public transport) | -0.44 | -0.46 to -0.41 | -40.26 | -0.32 | -0.34 to -0.29 | -25.02 |
 Time (Car) | -1.17 | -1.23 to -1.10 | -36.13 | -0.76 | -0.79 to -0.73 | -47.47 |
 CBD (Car) | -5.66 | -6.18 to -5.13 | -21.07 | -3.71 | -4.21 to -3.2 | -14.39 |
Non-random parameters (specific alternative) | ||||||
 Non-cycleway distance x Low intensity (Bicycle) | -1.16 | -1.38 to -0.92 | -9.68 | -0.99 | -1.25 to -0.74 | -7.76 |
 Rain > 3 mm (Bicycle) |  |  |  | -0.79 | -1.16 to -0.43 | -4.26 |
Model fit statistics | ||||||
 Log likelihood | -2478.7 | -1928.8 | ||||
 Chi-square | 2887.5 (p < 0.01) | 4878.7 (p < 0.01) | ||||
 Degrees of freedom | 11 | 12 |  |  | ||
 Pseudo-R2 | 0.58 | 0.56 |  |  | ||
 Akaike information criterion | 2091.9 | 3881.6 |  |  | ||