Skip to main content

Table 3 Rate of delivery by C-section and in a facility for the most recent birth of each woman within 5 years prior to their interview in Mali

From: Do free caesarean section policies increase inequalities in Benin and Mali?

 

Before implementation of the policy

After implementation of the policy

Trends in inequalities between period 1 and period 3

Period 1

Period 2

Period 3

p-valuec

Total

 All pregnant women

8247

4163

11,588

 

  % delivery by C-section

1.10

2.02

2.83

 

  % FBD

37.04

47.04

53.66

 

Women by zone of residence

 Urban

1794

1355

3215

 

  % delivery by C-section

3.34

4.13

6.28

 

  % FBD

80.42

79.57

87.15

 

 Rural

6453

2808

8373

 

  % delivery by C-section

0.48

1.00

1.50

 

  % FBD

24.99

31.30

40.80

 

Urban/rural inequalities

 aOR (95% CI) for C-sectiona

4.68 (2.09; 10.46)***

1.96 (0.58; 6.61)

2.05 (1.40; 3.00)***

0.032

 aOR (95% CI) for FBDb

4.37 (2.93; 6.53)***

3.22 (2.14; 4.86)***

2.60 (1.91; 3.55)***

0.121

Women by level of education

 Educated

1310

701

2103

 

  % delivery by C-section

2.75

4.42

5.85

 

  % FBD

64.74

80.54

81.53

 

 Non-educated

6937

3462

9485

 

  % delivery by C-section

0.79

1.53

2.16

 

  % FBD

31.80

40.27

47.49

 

Educated/non-educated inequalities

 aOR (95% CI) for C-sectiona

2.01 (1.23; 3.30)**

2.02 (0.99; 4.14)*m

1.39 (1.02; 1.89)*

0.043

 aOR (95% CI) for FBDb

2.18 (1.74; 2.72)***

3.68 (2.57; 5.29)***

2.06 (1.74; 2.43)***

0.702

Women by wealth quintiles of households (Q1 and Q5)

 Q1 - Poorest

1702

731

2211

 

  % delivery by C-section

0.47

1.09

1.09

 

  % FBD

21.16

29.26

30.76

 

 Q5 - Richest

1353

830

2360

 

  % delivery by C-section

3.77

4.58

6.95

 

  % FBD

86.03

86.64

92.37

 

Poorest/Richest inequalities

 aOR (95% CI) for C-sectiona

0.91 (0.13; 6.27)

13.86 (3.36; 7.30)***

2.45 (1.04; 5.78)*

0.743

 aOR (95% CI) for FBDb

5.54 (3.32; 9.26)***

2.21 (1.17; 4.16)*

8.58 (5.42; 13.56)***

0.449

  1. aOR adjusted odds ratio C-section caesarean section, and FBD facility based delivery
  2. Period 1 = February 1996 to May 2001; Period 2 = June 2001 to December 2004; and Period 3 = January 2005 to January 2013
  3. *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001; *m marginal level of significance (0.05 < m < 0.10)
  4. aThe aORs for C-section access were estimated with the use of the multivariate logistic regression models (adjusted based on age, education, wealth quintile of household, zone of residence, parity, and multiple pregnancy, as well as sampling weight, clustering and strata)
  5. bThe aORs for FBD access were estimated with the use of the multivariate logistic regression models (adjusted based on age, education, wealth quintile of household, zone of residence, parity, and multiple pregnancy, as well as sampling weight, clustering and strata)
  6. cp-values of the interaction between categories (urban vs rural or educated vs non-educated) and period (period 1 vs period 3) were estimated with the use of the multivariate logistic regression models (adjusted based on age, education, wealth quintile of household, parity, and multiple pregnancy, as well as sampling weight, clustering and strata)