Table 3 Multilevel models for perceived unfairness of health care inequalities (International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) 2011 (Nindviduals = 37,228))
From: Are health care inequalities unfair? A study on public attitudes in 23 countries
Model 0 | Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | CI | p | OR | CI | p | OR | CI | p | |
Fixed Parts | |||||||||
(Intercept) | 2.11 | 1.66–2.69 | <0.001 | 1.16 | 0.89–1.50 | 0.268 | 0.99 | 0.69–1.43 | 0.976 |
Equivalent household income (0 = highest tertile) | |||||||||
Medium | 1.31 | 1.22–1.40 | <0.001 | 1.31 | 1.22–1.40 | <0.001 | |||
Low | 1.46 | 1.35–1.57 | <0.001 | 1.46 | 1.35–1.57 | <0.001 | |||
Educational status (0 = lower level tertiary or higher) | |||||||||
Medium | 1.05 | 0.98–1.13 | 0.180 | 1.05 | 0.98–1.13 | 0.199 | |||
Low | 1.12 | 1.03–1.22 | 0.007 | 1.12 | 1.03–1.21 | 0.007 | |||
Age (0 = < 40 years) | |||||||||
40–60 years | 1.02 | 0.95–1.09 | 0.594 | 1.02 | 0.95–1.09 | 0.599 | |||
>60 years | 0.93 | 0.86–1.01 | 0.071 | 0.93 | 0.86–1.01 | 0.072 | |||
Sex (0 = male) | 1.49 | 1.41–1.58 | <0.001 | 1.49 | 1.41–1.58 | <0.001 | |||
Subjective health (0 = excellent/very good) | |||||||||
Good | 1.08 | 1.01–1.16 | 0.019 | 1.08 | 1.01–1.16 | 0.020 | |||
Fair/poor | 1.33 | 1.23–1.45 | <0.001 | 1.33 | 1.23–1.45 | <0.001 | |||
Insurance coverage (0 = well covered) | 1.31 | 1.20–1.44 | <0.001 | 1.31 | 1.19–1.44 | <0.001 | |||
Forgone care (0 = no) | 1.24 | 1.06–1.44 | 0.007 | 1.24 | 1.06–1.44 | 0.007 | |||
Welfare regimes (0 = Social-Democratic) | |||||||||
Conservative | 1.89 | 1.17–3.07 | 0.010 | ||||||
Liberal | 0.72 | 0.43–1.21 | 0.214 | ||||||
South European | 1.71 | 0.99–2.98 | 0.056 | ||||||
East European | 1.65 | 0.98–2.75 | 0.058 | ||||||
East Asian | 0.51 | 0.29–0.89 | 0.017 | ||||||
Random Parts | |||||||||
ICCcountry | 0.094 | 0.098 | 0.038 | ||||||
Between-country variation | 0.345 | 0.357 | 0.131 | ||||||
Deviance | 28,967 | 28,413 | 28,390 | ||||||
Ncountry | 23 | 23 | 23 | ||||||